Please wait...

Learn

Finding accredited CPD

Lower urgency care in the emergency department, and the suitability of general practice care as an alternative: a cross‐sectional study

Description

Emergency department (ED) function is impeded when the number of people waiting to be assessed, treated, or leave exceeds its capacity. It is, however, a misconception that overcrowding is caused by large numbers of people with problems that could be managed by general practitioners.

The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) defines lower urgency care (“GP‐type” patients) as ED presentations by people triaged as Australasian Triage Scale category 4 or 5, who did not arrive in an ambulance, police, or correctional services vehicle, were not admitted to hospital or referred to another hospital, and did not die. This definition may overestimate the number of GP‐type patients in EDs, but its prominent use prompts state governments to focus on increasing general practice services to reduce ED overcrowding.

This MJA research letter shares more. 


Learning Outcomes

  1. Explain key components of the research letter
  2. List main findings
  3. Recommend guideline for patients suitability for GP care to improve patients' outcome.

Details

Author: Haomin S Wu and James L Mallows

Article Type: Research Letter.

 

Provided by


CPD Activity Details
Topic
Health Services Administration, Accident and Emergency Medicine, General Medicine
CAPE Aspects
Professionalism
Effective Year

Educational Activities (EA) - 0.30

Reviewing Performance (RP) - 0.0

Measuring Outcomes (MO) - 0.0

You have to log in to see the content of this module.

*Medical Board of Australia’s (MBA)’s revised Registration Standard: Continuing professional development (the Standard)